End the Travel Ban on Cuba

Your Opinions Are Needed

Email Print PDF

Happy New Year! Things are starting to get back into swing in DC after the holidays - the House came back into session this week, the Senate comes back next week, and, of course, the presidential election primaries are on everyone's mind.

Read more »  
 

Cuba Policy Enters the Presidential Race

Email Print PDF

For the first time in a presidential election, U.S. policy toward Cuba has held national prominence. Two presidential candidates, Senators Barrack Obama (D-IL) and Chris Dodd (D-CT) have challenged the Bush Administration's stance on Cuba.

In an August 21st op-ed published in the Miami Herald, Senator Obama called for an end to restrictions on family travel and remittances to the island stating, "the (Bush) administration's decision to restrict the ability of Cuban Americans to visit and send money to their relatives in Cuba... is both a humanitarian and a strategic issue... It has also made them [Cubans] more dependent on the Castro regime and isolated them from the transformative message carried there by Cuban Americans."

Senator Dodd went even further, stating in a September 9th Univision debate, "I would begin to unravel that embargo. I would lift travel restrictions, so Cuban Americans can go visit their families. I would be lifting the restrictions on remissions." Fellow candidate, former Senator John Edwards (D-NC), called for an end to travel restrictions but stopped short of calling for a change in remittance caps. Representative Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) echoed Senator Dodd's call for a complete normalization of relations between the two countries and Governor Bill Richardson (D-NM) has also vowed to repeal Bush's restrictions on Cuban-American family travel and remittances.

Not all candidates support change in U.S.-Cuba policy, however. Frontrunner, Senator Hillary Clinton, favors maintaining the status quo toward Cuba and keeping the embargo and other restrictions in place. The Republican frontrunners, former Governor Mitt Romney (R-MA), Senator John McCain (R-AZ), former Senator Fred Thompson (R-TN) and former Mayor of New York City Rudolph Giuliani (R-NY), have all voiced similar views to those of Senator Clinton and the Bush Administration.

Presidential candidates have always looked at the Cuban-American community as a monolithic entity, whose hard-line conservative base needed to be appealed to take Florida during the election. A recent poll that measures Cuban-American sentiment in Miami-Dade County in Florida, however, shows a growing rift on Cuba policy within the Cuban-American community. The Florida International University Cuba Poll is carried out every couple years by the Institute for Public Opinion Research and the Cuban Research Institute of Florida International University to assess Cuban-American opinion on U.S.-Cuba policy and their views of the island. In the 2007 poll, researchers found that 65 percent of Cuban Americans in Miami-Dade County support starting a dialogue with Cuba. This is up from 55.6 percent in the 2004 Cuba Poll. Support for the U.S. embargo has also declined, from 66 percent in 2004 to 57.5 percent in 2007. Furthermore, 64 percent of the respondents would like to return to the 2003 policies governing travel and remittances.

Cuban-Americans are not the only ones with changing views toward U.S.-Cuba policy. In a 2007 Associated Press (AP) poll, 62 percent of Americans polled favored establishing diplomatic relations with Cuba. Based on these numbers, it would seem that the Republican presidential candidates might not want to rely on archaic Cuba policies as a means of winning votes – even in the key primary state of Florida.

Read more »  
 

Love, Loss and Longing Published, Congressional Update, President Bush's Speech, U.N. Vote

Email Print PDF

Our alert today has three parts - we want to announce the publication of our Cuban-American family photo exhibit into a moving photo essay book, Love, Loss and Longing: the Impact of U.S. Travel Policy on Cuban-American Families; we will give an update on what we can expect (or not expect) from Congress for the remainder of the year; and we will comment on President Bush's Cuba-policy speech last Wednesday.

Love, Loss and Longing

LAWGEF and our partners at the Washington Office on Latin America (WOLA) are pleased to announce that Love, Loss and Longing: the Impact of U.S. Travel Policy on Cuban-American Families has been published and is currently being distributed all over the country. If you haven't seen the book yet, take a look at it here The book is the published version of the photo exhibit many of you saw on tour in your area. The book includes the photos, testimonies, and expanded text about the effect of U.S. travel policy on all Americans.

The book has been delivered to every member of Congress; it would be great if you would call your members' offices (U.S. Capitol switchboard is 202.224.3121) to ask if they have seen it and encourage them to pay attention to it. This is another chance for you to send a message to your member of Congress that you care about Cuba policy. If their copy has been lost (or thrown away, as unfortunately often happens when congressional interns are opening the mail and have to assess the importance of each piece!), we would be happy to hand-deliver another copy to the appropriate staff person in your member of Congress' office - with your compliments. The offices just need to let you or us know that they need a replacement. We have also sent the book to our Cuba media contacts, and we are in the process of having the book be distributed through local progressive bookstores and on Amazon.com.

We need your help distributing the book! Do you have friends, family, co-workers, or distribution lists that should know about our book? Let us know and we'll be happy to send you promotional information to forward to your network. Do you know of bookstores in your area that should sell the book? Let us know so we can send review copies to them.

What's going on in Congress? (Be prepared; this is a discouraging section.)

In June, the House voted to increase the mismanaged "democracy assistance" funds supposedly intended to assist Cuban dissidents. Reps. Albio Sires (D-NJ) and Lincoln Diaz-Balart (R-FL) attached an amendment to the Foreign Operations Appropriations Bill in June to increase the funding from the $9 million the committee recommended to the $45 million the Bush Administration requested. Regrettably, the amendment passed 254-170.

Similar amendments were offered in the Senate to the Foreign Operations Appropriations bill. Senator Mel Martinez (R-FL) offered three negative amendments to the bill - one to increase the funding for Radio and TV Marti, one to increase the funding to the $45 million dollar level the Bush Administration requested for "democracy assistance" and one to significantly increase the funding for fumigations in Colombia. In final negotiations, Senator Martinez offered to withdraw two of the negative amendments in exchange for increasing the "democracy assistance" funding. (No surprise, as a GAO report from November 2006 shows a significant portion of this money stays with his constituents in Florida.)

And in late July, the House of Representatives voted 185-245 to defeat an amendment by Congressman Charlie Rangel (D-NY), a long-time advocate for changing Cuba policy, to facilitate the sales of U.S. farm products to the island. Unfortunately, many of our usual allies voted against this amendment. See our e-alert of July 26, 2007 for some analysis of this vote. These two losses have left many of our congressional allies frustrated and hesitant to offer other legislation that might also result in a loss. Add this on top of Congress' priorities of the war in Iraq, important votes on children's health care, and trying to prevent another war in Iran, and it is highly unlikely that we will see more congressional action on the Cuba issue for the remainder of the year. And, actually, we don't want to push for a vote before we are certain that it would be a winning vote.

So . . . we need to gear up to pave the way for action in 2008 - with educational activities and messages, calling to account our members of Congress who have abandoned this effort or reversed their vote (there are about 46 non-freshman democrats and republicans who used to be solidly with us but voted against the Rangel amendment), agitating for change (we're working with partner organizations on a plan), and adding to the support we have to be able to demonstrate that we CAN win this issue on the floor of the House and Senate.

One example of how we can agitate
We have been working with our partners at the Center for Democracy in the Americas, the Center for International Policy, and the Washington Office on Latin America to put together a Presidential Candidate Scorecard to rank presidential candidates' overall positions on Cuba. Just to be clear, the scorecard is NOT an endorsement of any candidate, but it is a valuable resource for evaluating candidates' positions. We expect to have the scorecard completed and a copy posted on our website within the next week. We will send you a quick note letting you know it's up. We hope you will use it to inform and educate in your state.

We will share the scorecard with members of the press, and we encourage you to review the scorecard and thank candidates that have positions that favor engagement and travel and question those who support the status quo. We will have more suggested actions when we send it out.

President Bush's Speech

**For more coverage of the speech, read this New York Times article

On Wednesday, October 24, President Bush made a speech at the State Department and announced several "new initiatives" on Cuba policy. The speech called for U.S. citizens to stand with the people of Cuba (Bush's version of "standing with" differs from ours!) in the "time of transition" and announced a program to license NGOs and faith-based groups to provide computer and internet access to students, invited Cuban youth to participate in a Latin American Youth scholarship program in the United States, and announced the creation of a multi-billion dollar so-called "Freedom Fund for Cuba." The President encouraged countries world wide to contribute to the fund, although it is unclear from where the President believes the political capital to create this fund would come, the U.S. leadership role and credibility in the world being as diminished as it currently is. Even the allies that President Bush mentioned in his speech - the Czech Republic, Poland and Hungary - have consistently voted against the U.S. embargo in the United Nations.

Speaking of the United Nations, the General Assembly of the United Nations voted 184-4 October 30, in the 16th consecutive loss by the United States, to end the U.S. embargo on Cuba. You can read more in this New York Times story.

President Bush's speech demonstrates how isolated the United States has become in efforts to have a voice in the debate on Cuba's emerging transition. If the President intends that the United States play any part (read: appropriate, non-interventionist) in Cuba's future, he would be wise to pursue a policy of engagement - as the majority of U.S. citizens wish - rather than continuing the failed policy of isolation and hostility.

Most dangerously, the President seemed to call for upheaval in Cuba - certainly not what the policy of the United States should be in any country. He said that "stability" was not the U.S. goal, rather "freedom." 

The speech came at a time when the President needs a distraction from the declining situation in Iraq, sagging political support in Florida, and the United Nations vote condemning the United States' embargo on Cuba.

The LAWG urges the administration and the Congress to become relevant and begin an immediate process of engagement, dialogue and policy change. Opening up trade and unrestricted travel to Cuba would be a good beginning.

Well, that's it for now. If you've read to the end, we hope you aren't discouraged. Your energy is needed even more now to keep the issue of Cuba policy before our legislators and our presidential candidates. As opportunities arise, we'll be coming back to you with requests for action and advocacy. Right now, please help us publicize and distribute the Love, Loss, and Longing book with policy makers and the public; help others to understand that Cuba policy is one of the keys to improving U.S. foreign policy in Latin America; be encouraged that change will come.

Read more »  
 

Love, Loss and Longing

Email Print PDF

Love, Loss and Longing: the Impact of U.S. Travel Policy on Cuban-American Families is the publication of a joint LAWGEF and WOLA photo exhibit highlighting the cruel effect of the travel ban on Cuban Americans. The photo exhibit was shown in over 20 cities throughout the United States and the stories of family separation U.S. policy caused touched countless Americans. Drs. Jeanne Lemkau and David Strug have interviewed and chronicled the heart-breaking stories of 20 Cuban Americans who have been unable to see their families. The photographs are the work of two talented Cuban-American photographers, Nestor Hernandez, Jr. and Juan E. Gonzalez Lopez.

Read our publication Love, Loss and Longing (PDF)

Read more »  
 

Labor of Love: The Story of a Photo Exhibit

Email Print PDF

What are the real family values when we keep families away from each other,? Mari, Washington, DC


In 2004, the Bush Administration issued a new set of harsh regulations on travel to Cuba, upping the ante significantly. While many Americans were impacted by this, the Cuban-American community has been affected most cruelly. Cuban Americans are restricted from traveling to the island more than once every three years to see their families, and family has been redefined in a very limiting way to include only: parents, siblings, children and grandparents. Aunts, uncles, cousins, nieces, nephews, and god-parents are totally off limits. There are no exceptions to these restrictions, not even for family emergencies or deaths. For the last three years, the Latin America Working Group Education Fund (LAWGEF) has worked closely with the Cuban-American community, the Washington Office on Latin America (WOLA), and other allies here in Washington, DC, to decry this violation of the basic right to visit one’s family.

One of our most ambitious projects to fight these restrictions was a photo exhibit, Love, Loss and Longing: the Impact of U.S.-Travel Policy on Cuban-American Families, which has been on national tour throughout 2006 and 2007. LAWGEF and WOLA have shown the exhibit in over 20 venues across the United States and have brought the message of needed change to thousands of Americans. Seeing how the exhibit’s photographs and accompanying testimonials touched viewers and opened their eyes to this cruel U.S.-policy’s impact, we have expanded the exhibit’s reach by publishing the exhibit in book form. You may view the book here

Why a photo exhibit?


Marisela’s father relied on her frequent visits and care packages to help fight his steadily-progressing Alzheimer’s. In 2004 the changed restrictions on travel to the island prohibited her from traveling to the island and reduced the amount and types of items she could send to support him. Shortly thereafter, Marisela’s father passed away; because she had been to see him during the previous three years, she was unable to attend his funeral. Now she asks: “I came to this country in pursuit of freedom! How is that…I can’t [visit] my father’s grave?” Mario, Sr., moved to the United States in 1992 and left behind his visually-impaired son, Mario, Jr. In the following years Mario, Sr., visited his son multiple times a year to help with maintenance around the house and to provide emotional support. Mario, Jr., recently had a son; and Mario, Sr., is now a grandfather. In 2004 when the restrictions on family travel changed, Mario, Sr., was prohibited from traveling to the island more than once every three years - no exceptions allowed. Now Mario, Sr., cannot help his son or be a part of his grandson’s childhood. He asks: “What does it mean to be a good father?” These are two of countless heartbreaking stories of family separation the LAWGEF has heard over the past three years.


 

Nestor Sr., 74
Upholsterer
Hyattsville, MD/Havana

"Who will take my ashes to Cuba?"

Nestor Sr. left Cuba more than 50 years ago hoping for a better life in the United States. He was 20. He settled in Washington, married and raised six children. Nestor Jr., photographer for this exhibit, is his oldest son. Vicente, who is pictured here, is his youngest.

Nestor Jr, was 18 when he traveled to Cuba and arrived unannounced on his grandmother’s doorstep in Los Pinos. With the embrace of his father’s relatives, he felt he had “come home.” Between 1978 and 2003 he made over 20 trips to Cuba, visiting family, exploring far corners of the island with his camera and organizing workshops and exhibitions with North American and Cuban photographers.

Vicente traveled to Los Pinos with his father and discovered that his Cuban family was larger than his family at home. Playing with cousins on the streets of Havana he felt safer than on the streets of Washington. After his trip he started asking more about his father’s homeland and began referring to himself as Cuban.

Under the restrictions neither Nestor Jr. nor Vicente can return to Cuba – ever. Their grandmother is deceased and their cousins aren’t eligible for visits as “family.”

Nestor Sr. wonders, “When I die who will take my ashes to Cuba if my sons can’t go?”

“¿Quién llevará mis cenizas a Cuba?”

Nestor, 74 Tapicero
Hyattsville, MD/Habana

Nestor Senior dejó Cuba hace más de 50 años para una vida mejor en los Estados Unidos. Tenía 20 años. Radicó en Washington, se casó y crió a seis hijos. Nestor Junior, fotógrafo para esta exhibición, es su hijo mayor. Vicente quien aparece en esta fotografía es el más joven.

Nestor Junior tenía 18 años cuando viajó a Cuba y llegó sin anunciarse a la puerta de la casa de su abuela en Los Pinos. Con el abrazo de los parientes del lado paterno se sintió que había “llegado a casa.” Entre 1978 y 2003 el hizo más de 20 viajes a Cuba, visitando a su familia, explorando los rincones de la isla con su cámara y organizando talleres y exhibiciones con fotógrafos estadounidenses y cubanos.

Vicente viajo a Los Pinos con su padre y descubrió que su familia en Cuba era más grande que su familia en casa. Jugando con sus primos en la calles de la Habana se sintió más seguro que en las calles de Washington. Después de su viaje, empezó a preguntarse más acerca de la patria de su padre y empezó a identificarse como cubano.

Nestor Senior se pregunta, “Cuándo yo muera, ¿Quién va a llevar mis cenizas a Cuba si mis hijos no pueden ir?”

 


Two years ago, Dr. Jeanne Lemkau, a clinical psychologist, professor emerita at Wright State University School of Medicine in Ohio, and admitted Cubaphile, walked into our office to discuss a new research project about the effect family travel restrictions have on Cuban families. The project would be a collaboration between Jeanne and Dr. David Strug from the Wurzweiler School of Social Work at Yeshiva University, NYC, and would take the two to Cuba and all over the United States to personally interview Cubans and their family members. They would use their background as a medical professionals to assess the restrictions’ impact on family health.

The LAWGEF’s Mavis Anderson realized the potential this study could have in the policy debate and suggested turning the research into a nationally-touring photo exhibit that would bring the Cuban-American stories of love and loss to Americans across the country.

Nestor, a Guiding Force

From that point forward, LAWGEF staffers Mavis Anderson and Claire Rodriguez, along with our partners, Elsa Falkenburger and Geoff Thale at WOLA, worked closely with Jeanne and David to shepherd the project through production and began the daunting task of coordinating a nationwide tour. We realized we were heading into uncharted territory when we sat down to brainstorm with the exhibit’s photographer, Nestor Hernández, Jr., on how to ship the exhibit from one venue to the next. Nestor, a Cuban-American photographer in Washington, DC, was a veteran of traveling photo tours and had exhibited his works all over the world. He became a guiding force in the photo exhibit, and his beautiful photography inspired us to forge ahead with the tour.

In February 2006, as Nestor was photographing the second half of the exhibit, he fell ill and was unable to continue the project. Our work came to a standstill as we absorbed what was happening – we were losing a colleague-turned-friend, and one of the driving motivations behind the exhibit. If we hadn’t been emotionally invested in the project before, we became so then.

It was too late to delay the scheduled May opening; we had congressional co-sponsorship and the invitations had already gone out. Jeanne quickly contacted another Cuban-American photographer in her hometown, Juan E. González López, who agreed to take over for Nestor. With Nestor’s encouragement, we pressed ahead. Juan studied Nestor’s photographs and started photographing the remaining participants, trying to preserve Nestor’s distinct style. Shortly before the exhibit’s opening, Nestor’s illness began to progress rapidly; and the week before the exhibit opened on Capitol Hill, Nestor was re-admitted to the hospital.

The day before the opening, Juan and Jeanne visited Nestor and showed him the completed exhibit. Nestor expressed deep appreciation to Juan for continuing the legacy of his style and seeing the project to completion. Tragically, Nestor passed away the day after the exhibit opened on Capitol Hill. The exhibit’s nationwide tour and the book are dedicated to his memory. Nestor’s father, Nestor Hernández, Sr., is featured in the exhibit; his support and Nestor’s spirit continue to guide our work.

Touring the Nation

The day the exhibit opened on Capitol Hill was a stressful day for our office. We wanted to make everything perfect, from assembling the easels to display the photographs at 6:00 in the morning and then rushing back to the office to put the whole exhibit online for press calls and immediate access for the public. In the late afternoon, the room started to fill, and over 150 people attended the opening reception. Congressman Bill Delahunt (D-MA) attended and spoke about the need to change policy. The next day the Miami Herald ran a story about the photo exhibit opening in the broader context of the changing Cuban-American community in Miami, FL.

Demand to show the exhibit in cities across the country was high. Love, Loss and Longing was exhibited in: Oakland and Sacramento, CA; Miami, FL; Chicago, IL; Bloomington, IN; Cambridge, MA; Baltimore, MD; Minneapolis, MN; Jackson Hole, WY; Newark, NJ; New York, NY; Yellow Springs and Dayton, OH; Devon, Philadelphia, and Pittsburgh, PA; and Arlington and Crystal City, VA.

Showing the photo exhibit in so many venues in such a short time presented many challenges that we had not anticipated. Who knew it would be so challenging to find a crate to ship a 200-pound photo exhibit or that shipping companies would be so unreliable? However, the rewards of accompanying the exhibit on its nationwide tour more than made up for the challenges. Working with an art exhibit allowed us to partner with people across the country with whom we never would have had the opportunity to collaborate. We worked with art galleries, museums, local governments, political cartoonists, churches, social-justice groups, restaurants, and committed individuals. We loved bringing so many new faces to the Cuba-policy debate.

Empowering the exhibit participants to share their stories of separation was a moving experience. Many of the Cuban Americans, especially those living in Miami, have faced vocal criticism for their position on travel; and their bravery in coming forward with the pain this policy causes their family was inspiring. The strength of their stories made the exhibit more moving and motivated us more than we thought possible. In Jackson Hole, WY, the photo exhibit host’s son, a young high school student whose father is Cuban American, saw the exhibit and was moved to tears by the stories portrayed in the exhibit. He said, “These people are just like our family.” His words inspired his older brother to accompany their father to Washington, DC, for a Cuban-American lobby day to speak in favor of ending the restrictions on travel for all Americans.

The day after the photo exhibit showed in Miami, an article ran in the Miami Herald about the changing nature of the Cuba debate in Miami. Love, Loss and Longing was exhibited at Tinta y Café, a new café on Miami’s Calle Ocho, which the owner opened to “give a voice to the silent majority of people in Miami who are frustrated with the failures of U.S. Cuba policy.” (1) Five years ago the café wouldn’t have been permitted to open, much less display a photo exhibit calling for policy change.

Wrapping it Up

The LAWGEF has seen how effective an advocacy tool the photo exhibit has been for our work and is considering touring another exhibit. The LAWGEF’s Colombia program hopes to bring a photo exhibit about the impact of the war in Colombia to the United States next year. The exhibit will tour the country visiting churches, peace organizations, and art galleries.

Finally, after a great year and a half, the time has come to retire the Love, Loss and Longing photo exhibit. We are pleased to announce that one copy of the exhibit will be on permanent display at the Dayton International Peace Museum. The museum provides a space to promote peace and nonviolent solutions to conflict. You can learn more about the museum and their initiatives at: http://www.daytonpeacemuseum.org. The other copy of the exhibit will be divided and shared with the exhibit participants.

Arlene, a photo exhibit participant from Chantilly, VA, says, “Family is more powerful than any law.” We know she is right—working together over the past year-and-a-half, we became like a family. We visited the photo exhibit subjects in their homes, in the hospital, and in their places of work. We have seen what families can do together. And we have witnessed the pain that a misguided policy can cause.

To order your copy of the Love, Loss and Longing book today click here

In addition, we are grateful to our faithful supporters and the many individuals who personally and generously donated to this project. We would especially like to thank the Christopher Reynolds Foundation, the Arca Foundation, Oxfam America, and the Bruderhof Foundation for their support of this project.

1. Corral, Oscar. “A New Forum for Exile Discourse.” Miami Herald. 23 February 2007


Read more »  
 
Page 39 of 42

Latin America Working Group
424 C Street NE
Washington DC 20002
Phone: (202) 546-7010
Email: lawg@lawg.org

© 2009 Latin America Working Group