|
THE
SITUATION OF THE RIGHTS OF WOMEN IN CIUDAD JUÁREZ, MEXICO:
THE RIGHT TO BE FREE FROM VIOLENCE AND DISCRIMINATION
Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Women
of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR)
While the
situation of women in Ciudad Juárez shares many aspects common
to other cities in the United Mexican States and the region generally,
it is different in certain important respects. First, the homicide rate
for women experienced an unusually sharp rise in Ciudad Juárez
in 1993, and the rate has remained elevated since that time. Second, …
the rate of homicides for women compared to that for men in Ciudad Juárez
is significantly higher than for similarly situated cities or the national
average. Third, the extremely brutal circumstances of many of the killings
have served to focus attention on the situation in Ciudad Juárez.
A significant number of the victims were young, between 15 and 25, and
many were beaten and/or subjected to sexual violence before being strangled
or stabbed to death. A number of the killings that fit this pattern have
been characterized as multiple or “serial” killings. Fourth,
the response of the authorities to these crimes has been markedly deficient.
There are two aspects of this response that are especially relevant. On
the one hand, the vast majority of the killings remain in impunity; approximately
20% have been the subject of prosecution and conviction. On the other
hand, almost as soon as the rate of killings began to rise, some of the
officials responsible for investigation and prosecution began employing
a discourse that in effect blamed the victim for the crime. According
to public statements of certain highly placed officials, the victims wore
short skirts, went out dancing, were “easy” or were prostitutes.
Reports document that the response of the relevant officials to the victims’
family members ranged from indifference to hostility. (4)
[M]any of
these killings are manifestations of violence based on gender, particularly
sexual violence and domestic or intrafamilial violence. While public and
official attention have focused on the brutality of and fear associated
with the so-called “serial” killings, insufficient attention
has been devoted to the need to address the discrimination that underlies
crimes of sexual or domestic violence, and that underlies the lack of
effective clarification and prosecution. The resolution of these killings
requires attention to the root causes of violence against women –
in all of its principal manifestations. (6).
What became
apparent was a gender-based violence related not just to the serial killings
but also to historical gender-based discrimination, which conveys that
domestic violence is punished as a lesser offense. (36)
During the
period from 1993 to January of 2002, 4,154 reports of missing persons
had been filed in Ciudad Juarez. Of these, 3,844 of the persons in question
had been located…257 of those reported missing remained unaccounted
for. (51)
On the subject
of Ciudad Juarez, the UN Special Rapporteur expressed that the inaction
of the government indirectly ensured that perpertrators ‘would enjoy
impunity for such crimes.’ In addition the independence of judges
suggests that judical actions ‘had severely weakened the rule of
law in the region.’ (108)
[There is
a] tendency on the part of many both in the State and non-state sectors
to focus on the killings characterized as ‘serial’ as the
legitimate source of concern because of their brutality. There is an insufficient
understanding that these deaths, whether perpetrated in connection with
sexual crimes by unknown perpetrators, or in connection with domestic
violence by intimate partners, are equally violative of the right to be
free from violence, and equally manifest the objectification or dehumanization
of the victim based on gender. The fact that the so-called ‘serial’
killings are portrayed in the media and viewed by many as shocking, while
the killings arising in connection with domestic violence are given less
attention, demonstrates the problem. (123)
[While violence
against women in Ciudad Juarez is] a problem of grave proportions, the
Special Rapporteur’s analysis confirms that the problem has not
been met with measures that respond to the gravity. The fact that the
vast majority of these crimes against women remain in impunity requires
an urgent response. (127)
Where such
inaction and tolerance is part of a pattern, the condoning of this situation
by the entire system only serves to perpetuate the psychological, social
and historical roots and factors that sustain and encourage violence against
women. It creates a climate that is ‘conducive to domestic violence’
because society sees no will on the part of the State to take effective
action against it. (129)
Impunity
for violence against women remains the general practice rather the exception.
Of the approximately 285 killings under study, dating back to 1993, only
20% have reached the stage of conviction. With respect to the so-called
‘serial’ killings within this group, only one person has been
convicted in relation to one death. (135)
The findings
of the recommendation 44/98 of the National Human Rights Commission to
the effect that the investigations evaluated were grossly deficient, and
that the authorities responsible should be held accountable for having
failed to discharge their responsibilities under the law, information
received indicates no efforts to hold any functionaries of Ciudad Juarez
responsible—administratively, disciplinary or criminally. (142)
In relation
to the issue of services for those affected by these crimes, the Special
Rapporteur has received repeated indications that the family members of
those killed have not been able to obtain access to adequate psychological
and social services. (150)
Programs
to assist women who have been subjected to violence must take the problem
of economic subordination into account in designing measures that will
enable women to remove themselves from abusive situations. Further, reports
suggest that women who have been subjected to domestic violence in Ciudad
Juarez may face serious obstacles with respect to protecting the interests
of their children and defining parental custody, and require available
and effective legal assistance in order to safeguard their rights and
those of their children. (151)
Information
received by the Commission in instances dating from 2001 indicates that
the first investigation measures were taken in some cases with lapses
of days in between.” (155)
“Training,
especially for those charges with responding to crimes of violence against
women, is an important means of developing technical capacity and an understanding
of the gender dimensions of the problem. (156)
The ability
to design effective prevention strategies is undermined by the lack of
empirical data in the breadth and depth of the problem of violence against
women in Ciudad Juarez. (160)
|