U.S. Military Policies Hinder U.S. Relations with Latin America
New Study Analyzes Trends in U.S. Military Programs in the Hemisphere
Washington, DC, 15 December 2005 – U.S. military programs are erasing
the line between military and civilian roles, both on the ground in Latin
America and in the U.S. government’s own foreign policymaking worldwide,
according to a report released today by three Washington-based human rights
organizations.
Erasing the Lines, a study of current U.S. military assistance in Latin
America, highlights several disturbing recent trends. Taken together, they
paint a troubling picture: the lines separating military and civilian governance
roles, firmly drawn by many Latin American governments after decades of
conflict and military dictatorships, are being erased both in U.S. policy
and in the region. These changes are taking place as “security”
doctrines are applied to a broad range of social problems and governance
challenges.
The lines are being erased at home as well, as the defense sector plays
an ever-greater role in the design and management of foreign aid. Military
assistance programs are moving into the Defense budget, where they are subject
to less transparency and civilian oversight, and are able to bypass important
human rights and democracy conditions.
An analysis of the trends documented in Erasing the Lines reveals that:
First, the U.S. government is changing the rules regarding how military
assistance programs are designed and carried out. Fifty-seven percent of
military training in Latin America is funded directly by the Pentagon, outside
of the State Department-managed foreign aid budget. This year the Pentagon
made a grab for even greater authority to train and equip foreign forces.
That means that the State Department is losing control over these risky
foreign policy tools, and Congress is carrying out almost no oversight.
“There are changes taking place, with no public debate, that are removing
the State Department from the foreign security assistance program and making
40 years worth of human rights and democracy legislation irrelevant,”
commented Joy Olson, Executive Director of the Washington Office on Latin
America.
Second, the U.S. military is engaging at new levels on a range of regional
problems that are not military in nature. The U.S. defense establishment
is viewing as “security threats” a wide range of phenomena that
do not require a military response, from youth gangs to populist movements
to drug-trafficking. Instead of helping Latin America to address these problems
by encouraging economic development and strengthening civilian institutions,
military aid to the region has multiplied since the 1990s and economic aid
has stagnated. “Latin America is the largest recipient of U.S. military
training worldwide, and U.S. military aid to the region almost equals economic
and social aid. This makes absolutely no sense for a region whose greatest
challenge is overcoming poverty and inequality,” said Adam Isacson
of the Center for International Policy.
Third, the U.S. government’s policies in the “global war on
terror,” including torture and rendition, have caused it to lose its
moral authority on human rights issues in the hemisphere. The impact can
be seen most clearly in Latin American and Caribbean governments’
reactions to the U.S. push for bilateral “immunity agreements”
exempting U.S. personnel from prosecution by the International Criminal
Court (ICC). Not even the U.S. government’s heavy-handed policy of
withholding economic and military aid to poor nations has convinced these
countries to forego their commitment to the ICC, and a surprising number
of Latin American and Caribbean nations are risking partial aid cut offs
as a result. “Latin American nations are being punished by the United
States for taking a stand against impunity for human rights violators,”
said Lisa Haugaard, Director of the Latin America Working Group Education
Fund. “It’s impressive to see governments that could benefit
from U.S. aid refusing to accept it out of principle.”
Erasing the Lines is a joint study by the Latin America Working Group Education
Fund (LAWGEF), the Center for International Policy (CIP), and the Washington
Office on Latin America (WOLA).
An executive summary of Erasing the Lines will be available, along with
the full report, on our website (www.wola.org) on Thursday morning, December
15th, at 9:30 am. The report provides a more in-depth analysis of the major
trends in U.S. military programs in the hemisphere.
Eleven Trends
1. The Defense Department makes a play for greater control over foreign
military programs.
2. A new counterterrorism program increases the Defense Department’s
role in foreign military training.
3. U.S. military aid still nearly equals economic aid to the region; neither
category has changed significantly since 2003.
4. The “securitization” of social issues muddies the waters.
5. The U.S. and Central American militaries contemplate a role in combating
gang violence.
6. A new International Law Enforcement Academy to be established in El Salvador.
7. “Enduring Friendship” maritime program could blur lines at
sea.
8. Human rights groups struggle to apply human rights provisions.
9. Insistence that U.S. soldiers be protected from International Criminal
Court limits U.S. aid to region.
10. U.S. policy fails to comprehend rise of Andean populist movements.
11. U.S. drug policy in Colombia at standstill, involvement in war grows.
For further information contact:
Joy Olson, WOLA: 202-797-2171 (office) or 202-468-3413 (cell)
Adam Isacson, CIP: 202-232-3317 (office) or 202-329-4985 (cell)
Lisa Haugaard, LAWGEF: 202-546-7010 (office)
|