| November
30, 2004
Cuba might not be at the top of your list (or maybe
it is!!) as we move into the holiday season, but there are some items
of interest that we thought we’d communicate to you before the rush
begins.
First of all, we’d like to thank you all for your
hard work this year. It was a very difficult climate here in Washington,
with the pending election overshadowing most policy decisions. We were
very much at risk this year of losing ground on the Cuba travel and remittances
issues, which we have won for many years in a row. But that did not happen
thanks to your hard work pressuring Congress to hold firm in the face
of intense administration pressure. To recap, remember that we:
* Won inclusion of a travel amendment in the Senate appropriations committee;
* Won a vote to overturn gift package restrictions in the House, 221-194;
* Won a vote to reverse new restrictions on Cuban-American travel in the
House, 225-174;
* Won voice votes on educational exchanges and financing of agriculture
sales in the House;
* And held our ground in a House vote to end the entire embargo (188-225).
None of these provisions made it through the convoluted
end-of-the-year appropriations process, where all the spending bills were
wrapped up into one omnibus measure; but the victories were important
nonetheless to show the administration and Republican leadership that
their Cuba policy is out of touch with the majority of Americans and that
we are not backing down.In addition to your hard work supporting these
legislative measures, we’d like to especially thank those of you
who donated to support our work this year. Because of you, we were able
to reprint and distribute “Ignored Majority,” our publication
about the moderate Cuban-American community; bring Cuban-American moderates
to Washington to participate in a press conference and educate members
of Congress about the increasing divide in their community over the embargo;
conduct a successful media campaign highlighting this divide; and finally
to print and distribute 15,000
brochures recruiting people to this email list. We genuinely couldn’t
have done this without your generous financial support. Thank you!
That said, we have to address the impact of another
Bush Administration on
Cuba policy. As we have seen in the past several years, the administration
has pursued a policy of increasing hostility and aggressive action against
Cuba, including actions against organizations with travel-related activities
and now companies engaging in the growing trade with Cuba. The continuing
effort to strangle the Cuban economy and to isolate Cuba, in the face
of world-wide condemnation of the embargo and of a majority domestic opinion
against the embargo, shows no signs of abating. Even though Congress has
repeatedly moved to dismantle the embargo, its decisions have been repeatedly
neutralized by the White House and the congressional leadership.
The outlook for the year ahead is best summed up with
“more of the same.” We
anticipate another year of legislative battles over the right to travel
and a struggle over the new Cuba provisions that the Bush Administration
enacted in June 2004. In a meeting with our key hill allies in late November,
it was clear that the members in the House and Senate are ready to attack
this issue with renewed enthusiasm. They believe that this coming year
will be one of the most important in the past several years on the Cuba
issue. A strong push from Congress to an administration not facing re-election
could break the travel logjam. You can have a huge impact on how this
plays out.
An impediment to this push will certainly be the new
senator from Florida, Cuban-American Mel Martinez. Senator-elect Martinez
has made clear that his stance will be hard-line on this issue, and he
will be working at the behest of the Bush Administration in the Senate
to halt efforts to ease the embargo. In an interview with the Miami Herald,
Senator-elect Martinez said that he hopes to become a leading voice for
the cause of a “free Cuba . . ., aggressively planning for a post-Castro
Cuba.” He takes pride in having “helped President Bush shape
policy toward Cuba,” and he “looks forward to playing a larger
role in legislating future U.S. attitudes and positions toward a post-Castro
Cuba.” It’s our job, as Cuba policy advocates, to push our
senators to stand up to Mr. Martinez and represent the interests of the
rest of the nation, which supports an easing of the embargo. And Mr.
Martinez should also be hearing from his moderate constituents, emphasizing
that Floridians do not all support a hard-line approach to Cuba policy.
As for the new House members, we’ll be sending
you an analysis of the new
members shortly—when we do, please be ready to begin educating them
on the need for a new Cuba policy. The positions that new members, especially
Republicans, adopt early in the congressional session are critically important
to our ability to add to the vote counts on Cuba amendments. We’ll
likely be coordinating, along with several other organizations, a large
education day on the Hill here in Washington, DC, focusing on educating
members of Congress, (especially new ones) about Cuba policy. We’ll
send more details as they become firm. For those that can’t make
it to Washington, DC, we’ll also be coordinating a simultaneous
national Cuba Call-In Day in support of a change in policy. Again, details
will be coming.
In summary, we had a successful year last year—in
spite of a hostile political atmosphere. You should congratulate yourselves
for a job well done. We think that next year could be a very important
year for changes in Cuba policy. We’ll be in touch soon with the
new House member analysis.
|