|
The Bush Administration’s budget
for fiscal year 2005, presented to Congress in the first week of February,
contains some discouraging news for Latin America.
The major programs for humanitarian assistance, providing
aid to address poverty and fund development, have taken a hit. Child Survival
programs for Latin America, which provide child and maternal health and
family planning services, were cut almost 12% ($17.2 million), to $130.3
million. Development assistance programs, which support agricultural assistance,
microenterprise, and other programs, were cut almost 10% ($26.1 million),
to $241.7 million. The Inter-American Foundation, which provides funding
for small-scale projects, was cut by 6% ($1 million) to $15.18 million.
New Initiatives--Less than Meet the Eye
The Bush Administration has showcased its “compassionate
conservatism” internationally by funding two major initiatives,
the “Millennium Challenge” and contributions to the global
fight against HIV/AIDS. While many applauded the White House’s interest
in these issues, the amounts actually requested by the White House from
Congress for both initiatives are considerably less than the sums announced
with great public fanfare. In addition, cuts in similar programs partially
offset the increases in these new initiatives.
The Bush Administration requested $2.5 billion in 2005
to fund the Millennium Challenge, a new account set up to provide assistance
to the poorest countries, less than the $3.3 billion which the White House
had originally promised. Moreover, regular humanitarian and development
accounts were cut by nearly $400 million from last year’s levels,
according to Interaction, an association of aid agencies. The President’s
HIV/AIDS initiative is offset partially by a decrease of $350 million,
according to Interaction, in US contributions to the Global Fund set up
internationally to provide resources to address the AIDS pandemic.
Neither the Millennium Challenge nor the President’s
HIV/AIDS program provide much assistance to Latin America. The Millennium
Challenge provides funding only to countries that meet certain strict
criteria and with a per capita income of less than $1415 in 2005, which
leaves out most Latin American nations. The HIV/AIDS initiative is limited
to fourteen countries, of which only two, Haiti and Guyana, are from the
Latin American and Caribbean region.
Military Aid, and Aid to Colombia, Steady
One area of funding for Latin America remains steady
– military assistance. Foreign military financing reaches $126.5
million in the 2005 request for Latin America, of which $108 million is
for military training and equipment for Colombia. International Military
Education and Training (IMET), which funds training of Latin American
security forces, holds steady at $14 million. (Detailed information about
US assistance to Latin America and the Caribbean is available on a website
maintained by the Latin America Working Group, the Center for International
Policy and the Washington Office on Latin America at www.ciponline.org/facts
.)
For 2005, the Bush Administration once again requests
a whopping $731 million for the Andean Counternarcotics Initiative, of
which $463 million is devoted to Colombia, substantial sums to Peru, Bolivia,
and Ecuador, and smaller quantities to Brazil and Venezuela. While this
package includes funding for alternative development programs that help
small farmers switch away from drug crops to legal crops, as well as for
judicial reform, over 65% of the total is for military and police aid.
For Colombia, almost 78% of the budget can be expected
to be military and police aid (when the $108 million in foreign military
financing, 1.7 million in IMET, and estimated $100 million generally included
in the Defense Department’s budget are added to the Andean Counternarcotics
Initiative). While the initial impetus for aid to Colombia was to fight
drugs, the US mission was expanded in 2002 to fight both drugs and terrorism,
thus permitting direct support for the Colombian army in its war against
guerrilla forces. For Colombia, it’s not “guns and butter,”
but “guns, guns, guns and butter.”
Big Boost for Border Security
Despite putting forward an immigration reform proposal
in 2004, the Bush Administration continues to increase the Department
of Homeland Security’s budget for security measures along the US
border with Mexico. Many of these plans are described as national security
measures. However, they follow a much longer pattern of anti-migrant programs,
and meet requests from the Border Patrol that have been pending since
before September 11, 2001. First in line is a $64 million increase in
spending on technology for the border – primarily remote video surveillance
cameras– and a new $10 million budget to begin flying unmanned drones.
Overall, there is a $224 million (10%) increase in the border security
budget. While some of this budget will go to guarding the northern border
with Canada, less than 10% of the Border Patrol’s budget has traditionally
gone to security there.
Also complicating the political message in President
Bush’s immigration reform proposal is a large increase in the budget
for immigrant deportation. Though President Bush’s immigration reform
proposal would provide visas for workers who are currently in the country
– providing them legal status without disrupting the availability
of workers – his 2005 budget proposes a $100 million increase for
the detention and removal of illegal migrants currently in the US. If
immigration reform is truly a priority for 2004, this budget line confuses
that message.
While security consistently gets boosts in the 2005
budget proposal, domestic preparedness is taking some serious hits. Though
the Federal Emergency Management Agency gets an overall increase in its
budget of $1.8 billion dollars, almost all of the increase is dedicated
to Biodefense – preparing the US against a biological attack. In
the meantime, non-natural disaster funds have been slashed by $220 million
(32%). Following this trend, the Office for Domestic Preparedness, which
funds first responders (such as local police and firefighters), is taking
a significant cut in its funding of $805 million (19%). The biggest cuts
come to state and local grants; citizen corps; and state and local training,
exercises, and technical assistance. All in all, programs promoting national
defense get big boosts, but on-the-ground programs to respond to an emergency
are dealt a serious setback.
Lost in the Fine Print
The Bush Administration has made an interesting choice
to scale back Latin America programs in an election year in which the
Latino vote is important. Deep in the fine print of the budget, the White
House may hope these cuts go unnoticed.
Note: The numbers cited are from the document “Summary
and Highlights: International Affairs Function 150, Fiscal Year 2005 Budget
Request,” available at http://www.state.gov/m/rm/rls/iab/2005. See
also “Interaction Reacts to FY05 Budget Request,” Statement
by Mary E. McClymont, CEO Interaction, at www.interaction.org .
--Lisa Haugaard and Sean Garcia, Latin America Working
Group
|