– Rev. Mari Castellanos, D.Min.
March 2006
For those of us who believe in the Incarnation, Jesus is the solidarity
of God.
Emmanuel, God is with us. When we look at the manger or the flight to Egypt;
when we contemplate the healing of the lepers, when we kneel before the
cross, we do not see Christ the King. We do not see a triumphant Messiah.
We see the Servant of Yahweh who suffered the lot of the poor, the voiceless,
the oppressed. In the gospels, Jesus says to us: “if anyone wants
to be my follower, let them pick up their cross and follow me.” But,
we can actually say that it was Jesus who picked up the cross of the poor
and followed them, as an act of solidarity. The poor have preceded, followed
and walked alongside Jesus, carrying crosses placed on their shoulders by
the empires of every age. It is no surprise that among the suffering poor
in Latin America, and elsewhere, the image of the suffering Christ –
Jesus Nazareno – is the object of greatest devotion, alongside that
of Mary who stood in solidarity by the cross. They model to us what we mean
by solidarity.
Christians began to see Christ as King, crowned with gold rather than thorns,
when the church stopped being in solidarity with the suffering poor. The
post-Constantine church spiritualized poverty as a virtue for the pious,
something religious people opted for to be unencumbered by worldly cares,
not as a terrible social condition to be overcome. Alternatively, then as
now, the truly poor provided an opportunity for the affluent to show mercy,
and therefore enjoy feeling virtuous. But in the social political reality
of first century Palestine – or twenty-first century-Palestine - to
be Christ-like was and is to be in solidarity, to share the burden of the
poor, and to seek justice. To choose poverty as an act of love of neighbor
is to share the burden of the poor. Not to idealize it, but to struggle
to overcome it. Any social, religious or political system that implements
policies that result in increased levels of poverty, and/or conditions of
oppression, endangerment and injustice, is to be struggled against by those
who seek to be in Christ-like solidarity with suffering humanity. This is
not political rhetoric. This is Christian theology and spirituality.
Solidarity is the richest expression of love. It means to be in a committed
relationship of mutuality, collaboration and respect across economic, national
and social boundaries. It means crossing borders, together, perhaps even
exchanging identity cards. It is not the good charity shown by kindhearted
people towards the victims of the national disasters around the world, however
generous and necessary. To quote an e-resource from Maryknoll of North Texas
“… a transnational company, (or) most of the upper and middle
classes can give alms, but they can never make solidarity, unless they can
be converted to be unfaithful to themselves.” Walmart might have been
the first to get trucks with supplies to New Orleans. That does not mean
Walmart is in solidarity with the people of the Gulf.
Most of us can aspire to be in growing degrees of solidarity with the struggling
poor. As North Americans, we carry an enormous burden of riches and privilege,
yet few of us feel called to disrobe in the public square and walk away
from it all, like Francis. But, we can use our privilege and resources to
counter balance the powerlessness of the poor and to be the voice of the
voiceless. That’s what we are here to do this weekend.
2006 is an Election Year. The people of the world do not elect our government.
Nonetheless, they live with the consequences of our choices. Given the gravity
of those consequences, for Americans not to vote is a sin against the world,
a breach of sacred solidarity. On this election year, this is a particularly
serious moral imperative. The people of Iraq or Iran; Colombia, Mexico or
Cuba cannot elect the Congress that will determine much of what will happen
to their economies; they do not vote for the Senate who can authorize armies
to make war in their homelands. Christian solidarity demands of us, not
only that we cast ballots on their behalf, but that we energetically work
to elect a Congress that will put righteousness over partisanship. We must
do so on behalf of the earth and all God’s children. For Latin America,
Africa, and the Middle East; for song birds, manatees and polar bears, we
must do so to be in holy solidarity.
“A theology of solidarity is not an abstraction. Rather, it embodies
the reality of a particular community in a particular time, particular place,
and particular struggle.” * Churches must be built upon a theology
of solidarity, must be organized around the vision of the Reign of God,
a commonwealth of love and justice in which no one is left out. No one.
From the front pew to the ends of the earth. Solidarity goes beyond intercessory
prayers at Sunday worship. However, prayer is a critical component of lives
lived in solidarity. We need the prayers of those who suffer injustice,
that we may have the courage to confront our own complicity in their suffering.
In turn we must pray that God grants us the strength to challenge our increasingly
idolatrous society. Solidarity is not the easiest, perhaps not the most
comfortable way of being in the world. It is just the way of Jesus who embodied
the solidarity of God. * Unable to locate source.
|