Write a Letter to the Editor: Call for U.S. policies to support a place to call home for everyone in Colombia! Did you hear what President Obama did while in Colombia last weekend? Despite ongoing murders of union leaders and land rights activists, he glossed over all the human rights violations, ignored the continuing displacement crisis, and announced that Colombia had fulfilled its requirements on labor rights that would allow the U.S.-Colombia free trade agreement to go into effect on May 15.
Conflict, Violence, and Murders of Colombian Activists Concern U.S. Groups
The Latin America Working Group (LAWG), Washington Office on Latin America (WOLA), U.S. Office on Colombia (USOC), Center for International Policy (CIP), and the U.S. Labor Education in the Americas Project (USLEAP) urge President Obama to refrain from declaring that key elements of the Labor Action Plan (LAP) linked to the Free Trade Agreement have been effectively implemented at this week’s Summit of the Americas in Cartagena, Colombia or in his subsequent meeting with Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos. The labor and human rights situation in Colombia has not improved sufficiently to implement the Free Trade Agreement.
On April 7, 2011, the U.S. and Colombian governments announced the signing of the U.S.-Colombia Labor Action Plan (LAP). In it, both governments expressed their commitment to provide a level playing field of economic opportunities for U.S. sectors as well as guarantees that Colombian workers would “have acceptable working conditions and respect for fundamental labor rights.” The Colombian government confirmed its obligation to protect internationally recognized labor rights, prevent violence against labor leaders, and prosecute the perpetrators of such violence. The LAP spells out critical changes needed to protect trade unionists, guard against labor rights abuses, eliminate the abusive associative labor cooperative (CTA) model, and advance prosecutions of perpetrators of anti-labor violence. The U.S. government announced that it was committed to reforming the security environment for all Colombians, addressing the needs of victims, and enhancing rule of law. Implementation of the key elements of the LAP is a precondition for the U.S.-Colombia Free Trade Agreement to enter into effect.
It is premature for the United States to declare sufficient progress under the terms of the LAP. In doing so, the U.S. government would lose a tremendous political opportunity to significantly improve labor rights in Colombia. While a number of laws and regulations have been issued, key elements of the LAP remain unfulfilled as evidenced in Colombia’s failure to fully ban problematic associative labor cooperatives and other forms of labor intermediation that bust unions. Furthermore, in priority sectors of the LAP including sugar and ports, businesses are turning to CTA-like models with different names to employ workers and deny them their rights. The Colombian government is not acting effectively to prevent this, as conditioned by the LAP. It remains a common practice to fire workers who wish to affiliate with trade unions and then to stigmatize these workers so that they cannot find employment elsewhere, driving them into poverty.
Union activists remain in grave danger in Colombia. Thirty trade unionists were murdered in 2011, and 4 unionists were killed so far in 2012. The security situation for human rights defenders significantly deteriorated in 2011 with attacks increasing by 36% compared to 2010. Of the 49 human rights defenders killed in 2010, 19 were indigenous leaders. Colombia needs to enforce the rule of law in order to send the signal to perpetrators that it will not tolerate further attacks against trade unionists, human rights, and community activists or other human rights violations.
Instead of making progress, Colombian government is taking steps backwards on human rights crimes. Military justice legislation under consideration by the Colombian Congress could lead to the prosecution of many kinds of human rights crimes committed by the military to return to military courts, thus rolling back historic advances in Colombian justice. The “legal framework for peace” bill would allow the judiciary to suspend existing sentences for any crimes committed by actors in the armed conflict. Not only do such provisions constitute a major boost towards guaranteeing impunity for human rights abuses, they also constitute a breach of the human rights conditions tied to U.S. military assistance towards Colombia.
While the Santos administration has improved its public rhetoric regarding human rights, the steps it has taken have failed to adequately improve protections for human rights defenders. President Santos’ flagship victims and land restitution law, an initiative we support in essence, is severely lacking in protection for victims. Even before the law has been fully applied, 26 land rights activists were killed during the Santos administration. Furthermore, new victims continue to be created in Colombia due to ongoing forced displacement linked to the conflict and abuses committed by the armed groups. For effective protection of communities, land rights activists, trade unionists, and human rights defenders to take place, the U.S. must express its grave concern for the expansion of paramilitary groups and encourage bold efforts to dismantle their operations. The Colombian government also needs to develop a well-financed and coordinated civilian agency plan to protect land rights activists and communities through careful consultation with affected parties.
Rather than making premature judgments about progress in labor and human rights—judgments that are not supported by facts—the United States should use the opportunity of the meeting in Cartagena to encourage its ally to make further reforms. Finally, the U.S. government should respond to a historic opportunity presented by the release of hostages—and the announcement by the FARC guerrillas that they are abandoning kidnapping for profit—to encourage a negotiated solution to the protracted conflict that has undermined security and human rights in Colombia for many decades.
For further information please contact:
Lisa Haugaard, Executive Director, Latin America Working Group (LAWG) (202) 546-7010
Gimena Sanchez, Senior Associate, Washington Office on Latin America (WOLA) (202) 797-2171
Dana Brown, Executive Director, U.S. Office on Colombia (USOC) (202) 232-8090
Abigail Poe, Deputy Director, Center for International Policy (CIP) (202) 232-3317
Stephen Coats, Executive Director, U.S. Labor Education in the Americas Project (USLEAP) (773) 262-6502
by Vanessa and Lisa, LAWG's Colombia Teamon February 14, 2012
Did you know that 60% of flowers bought in the United States come from Colombia? Nearly 100,000 mostly female flower workers have been working 16- to 18-hour days for poverty-level wages to get us the flowers that thousands of people will buy today.
This year, LAWG’s Colombia team brought together a coalition of labor, human rights, faith-based, and environmental groups to build a national grassroots movement to oppose the U.S.-Colombia free trade agreement (FTA). While this FTA ultimately did pass on October 12th, 2011, we are proud of the work that everyone involved did to generate debate about the problems with this trade deal and to convince many members of Congress to vote for human rights rather than corporate interests. Click here to find out how your members of Congress voted and hold them accountable!
Just through the participation of LAWG’s activist base alone, we collected 11,695 signatures on a petition to President Obama, sent over 13,000 emails to Congress, and made hundreds of phone calls right before the vote. By connecting with other groups for fair trade, we were able to multiply our collective voice by tens of thousands. In many major cities, people came together to stage vigils in the streets, which grabbed the attention of local and national media. They spoke out at town hall events and met with their members of Congress when they came back to the district for recess. While LAWG made videos and wrote articles for sites like the Huffington Post, activists across the country published op-eds and letters to the editor in their local newspapers.
Meanwhile, in DC, LAWG and our partners pounded the marble halls of Congress. We brought Colombian unionists, human rights defenders, and small-scale farmers to meet with undecided members of Congress, educating them about the devastating affect that this trade deal would have on the lives of so many Colombians. We displayed the art exhibit Remember Me: Voices of the Silenced in the U.S. House of Representatives to let the testimonies of survivors of Colombia’s conflict speak for themselves. Then, right before the vote, we provided our congressional allies with talking points as well as stories and photos to use in their final arguments.
And in the end, we made a difference. During the debate, we watched as representatives and senators stood on the floor of Congress and told the stories of union leaders who have been killed in Colombia, of families who have been devastated by the conflict, of Afro-Colombian and indigenous communities who are struggling to stay on their ancestral lands. We convinced 82% of House Democrats to vote against this unfair trade agreement. This represents the largest percentage of House Democrats voting against a Democratic president on trade in history, and it sent a message to President Obama: no more trade without human rights.
Missed the action? Check out this powerful speech by Representative Luis Gutiérrez in which he honors the lives of two murdered Colombian activists: Alejandro José Peñata, a teacher and unionist, and Ana Fabricia Córdoba, a dynamic Afro-Colombian social leader who struggled for the rights of the displaced.
To read the inspiring speech that Representative Jim McGovern gave during the debate, click here. LAWG sends a big thank you to Rep. McGovern for his tireless efforts to oppose this agreement, as well as to House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi who “stopped the clock” on this FTA in 2008 and came out against it last week. Thanks also to Representatives Sandy Levin, Mike Michaud, George Miller, Hank Johnson, and John Lewis, Senators Sherrod Brown and Bernie Sanders, and all the other members of Congress who chose to speak out for human rights during this critical debate.
Although the fact that it passed was upsetting, we were encouraged in the week afterwards when we received messages from our partners in Colombia thanking us for what we’ve done to keep this FTA off the table since it was introduced by the Bush Administration five years ago. By delaying it so long, they said, we pressured the Colombian government to clean up its record on human rights—and they have made some good promises. However, the struggle does not end here.
In the months ahead, we will focus our efforts on making sure that both the U.S. and Colombian governments keep their word to support communities, unionists, small-scale farmers, and others whose livelihoods and safety may now be at greater risk than ever before. We look forward to working with both old and new partners to stand by our brothers and sisters in Colombia as they face these challenges and continue their pursuit of peace and justice.
by Vanessa Kritzer, LAWG's Colombia Teamon October 21, 2011
Despite more than five years of incredible work by people like you to advocate for fair trade policies, we are disappointed to report that the U.S.-Colombia free trade agreement passed in the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate.
"Why do we care so much about this?" said Lisa Haugaard, Executive Director of the Latin America Working Group (LAWG). "Because we believe that passage of this agreement will make it harder to encourage the Colombian government to protect its trade unionists, who are still murdered with impunity today—23 so far this year. Because we believe the flood of agricultural imports from the United States will undermine Colombia’s small-scale farmers, including Afro-Colombians and indigenous people, who have suffered so much in Colombia’s civil war. And because it will boost the kinds of large-scale investment, such as mining and biofuel, that has helped to fuel the violence in a conflict that still grinds brutally on."
by Lisa Haugaard and Vanessa Kritzer, LAWG Colombia Teamon September 15, 2011
We’re up against some big forces in our struggle against the U.S.-Colombia Free Trade Agreement (FTA): major corporations, the Chamber of Commerce, stubborn Republicans, free trade-loving Democrats, and even the President. They have money, power, and connections. But we have conviction.
We have hardworking partners in the United States. We have incredibly brave community leaders and human rights defenders on the ground in Colombia telling us every day about why this trade deal will be so devastating for those already hit hardest by Colombia’s conflict. And we have something better than a slingshot to fight this Goliath—YOU.
Congress will vote on the U.S.-Colombia Free Trade Agreement TOMORROW, Wednesday, October 12th. So, even if you’ve called once, twice, or more before, your members of Congress need to hear from you NOW. Follow the simple instructions below to make your call today!
Call Instructions
Step 1—Call the capitol switchboard at 202-224-3121 and ask to be connected to your representative or one of your senators. (They all need to hear from you!) If you don't know who represents you, click here to look it up by entering your zip code. Then pick up the phone and dial!
Step 2—Ask to speak to the senator or representative. If you can't speak to him/her, ask for the aide that works on trade and labor issues. Keep your message simple. Just say:
“My name is ____. I am a constituent calling to urge Representative/Senator ____ to take a stand for human and labor rights by publicly opposing the U.S.-Colombia Free Trade Agreement.”
Step 3—If you have time once you're done with your first call, get on the line with your other members of Congress too.
Congrats! You've done it. Now send the link to this page to 10 friends asking that they make the call too!
Only together can we defeat this harmful trade agreement. Thanks for doing your part!
If you have any questions, give us a call at 202-546-7010 or
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
.
The August recess is always a crucial time for people to connect with their members of Congress. Elected officials meet with corporate lobbyists multiple times every day. August is the time of the year when they spend the longest chunk of time back home, in-district, talking with constituents. It's when they get their best sense of what people really think. Given that the U.S.-Colombia Free Trade Agreement and other FTAs are expected to be voted upon this fall, this August recess takes on added significance. It very well could be our last opportunity to see our Members of Congress face-to-face before the votes. For those of us who have been working to defeat the Colombia FTA for years now, it's exciting and energizing, and perhaps even a little scary, to know that what we do over the next three weeks is likely to determine whether we win or lose on this crucial issue.
Tactics
Lobby Visits: Requesting a face-to-face meeting with your members of Congress is the best way to ensure that they actually receive the info you're trying to give them and that you get an opportunity to identify and rebut any misperceptions they may have. Obviously, lots of people are trying to meet with their Members this August, so it is crucial that you get a request in now. You do that by calling the district office and asking to speak with the scheduler. Click here to look up their office numbers by searching either by name of the member of Congress or your zip code.
Be prepared to tell them who, beyond yourself, is requesting the meeting and what the topic is. If you have a small group going, it makes sense to have the most powerful person in that group ask for the meeting—someone who represents a constituency the Member cares about. A minister, a union leader, a campaign donor, whomever. Try to have a sense of the best meeting time that works for the group, and know that you'll need to be flexible. You may not find a time that works for everyone in your party. The scheduler is also likely to suggest a meeting with staff rather than with the Member. It's worth pushing a bit to request a meeting with the Member directly. You can talk about how many years you've been working on this, and how a vote is expected shortly after Labor Day. If it looks like there's no way you'll get the meeting, obviously meeting with staff is better than no meeting at all. If possible, try to meet with the District Director or staff from Washington, DC if they're in town, rather than just some intern who takes notes and has no idea what you're talking about. To find resources to prepare for and bring to your meeting, click here.
Call-in Days: We will have multiple call-in days throughout the summer, in which we'll centralize our efforts by having activists across the country make calls on the same day to make sure our legislators know the large scale of opposition to this harmful trade agreement. The first will happen on Wednesday, August 17th. Click here to get instructions on how to make an effective call.
Beyond just making phonecalls yourself, you can encourage others to do so by forwarding around the email about it. Posting it to Facebook. Tweeting it. You could organize a call-in lunch party at your work where you buy a pizza and give folks a slice once they've called. You can do something at your home where you gather folks to watch on of the great YouTube videos about the FTA, lead a discussion group about it, and then have people call and leave messages—and hopefully then discuss what more people want to do together. It's a lot easier to make a call when you see everyone around you doing it. And if you have an extra moment, click here to follow your phone calls up with an email to your members of Congress too.
Speaking Out and Bird-Dogging at Public Events: Most Members of Congress do town halls and other public events throughout the August recess. You want to ensure that they're hearing opposition to the Colombia FTA at each and every one of those appearances. The first trick is finding out when and where they're going to be. Some Members will publish their schedule for the entire month on their website. Others only post events a couple days before they happen. Make sure to check the website often. Sign up for their email lists and Facebook pages. When in doubt, you can also call the office and say you're a constituent looking wondering if there are any public events where you can see the Member.
Then you need to be prepared with what I call a question-statement. Give three or four lines of info before posing a very pointed question like: "I was disappointed to hear that Congress may be voting upon the Colombia Free Trade Agreement when you return from recess this September. As you know, Colombia is the deadliest country in the world to be a union member. President Obama and Colombian President Santos recently offered up a side agreement that is supposed to help address the murders there, but its not binding in the FTA, and Colombian and American unions have called it inadequate. How can we have so-called "free trade" with a country where workers' basic freedoms aren't protected?" You can work on the wording and choose which issue you're going to focus on, but try to get enough info in there and make the question pointed enough that it really puts them on the spot.
And the third trick, of course, is recruiting friends and colleagues to go with you. It increases the opportunity one of you will get to ask a question—or that the member will receive multiple questions.
Get Your Message in the Media: What is published in your local papers and widely-read blogs during the recess can also help to keep the pressure up. You can write Letters to the Editor or if you've got some sort of title or were recently in Colombia, you could try submitting an op-ed. Click here to use Witness for Peace's letter to the editor writing tool online.
Creative Demonstrations: Creativity also helps grab the attention of both your legislators and the media. If you've got a critical mass, you could organize a vigil or a picket or a die-in outside a Member's office. Get everyone in your town to sign a petition against the FTA, make copies, and then have everyone drop by your legislators' offices to deliver the petition one after another along with a verbal message. The sky is the limit!
The important thing is to do what you can. Anyone who is still undecided on the Colombia FTA at this point in time is only going to be swayed by constituent pressure. Our brothers and sisters in Colombia have been risking a lot to fight this thing; but they can't stop it at this point. We can. It's up to us to make it happen.
Note: This text was written by Citizens Trade Campaign with only a few edits from the Latin America Working Group. For more information from CTC, please go to http://www.citizenstrade.org/ctc/
The Latin America Working Group (LAWG), Washington Office on Latin America (WOLA), U.S. Office on Colombia (USOC), Center for International Policy (CIP), and the U.S. Labor Education in the Americas Project (USLEAP) urge President Obama to refrain from declaring that key elements of the Labor Action Plan (LAP) linked to the Free Trade Agreement have been effectively implemented at this week’s Summit of the Americas in Cartagena, Colombia or in his subsequent meeting with Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos. The labor and human rights situation in Colombia has not improved sufficiently to implement the Free Trade Agreement.
